European Community Plaintiff, v. RJR Nabisco, Inc. et al., Defendants. Department of Amazonas, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., et al., Defendants.
-
- Up one level
- *Tracey Basler - Cigarettes, Smuggling, and Terror: The European Community vs. RJ Reynolds
Tracey Basler - Cigarettes, Smuggling, and Terror: The European Community vs. RJ Reynolds (downloaded October 2, 2015)
- Wall Street Journal - EU Nations File New Smuggling Lawsuit Against R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris
EU Nations File New Smuggling Lawsuit Against R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris By Geoff Winestock, Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal, Updated Aug. 7, 2001 12:01 a.m. ET
- The Guardian - Philip Morris reaches $1.25bn EU agreement
Philip Morris reaches $1.25bn EU agreement Mark Tran, @marktran, The Guardian, Friday 9 July 2004 10.56 EDT
- European Community Plaintiff, v. RJR Nabisco, Inc., et al., Defendants; and related suits, 2001.
THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY Plaintiff, v. RJR NABISCO, INC., et al., Defendants. Department of Amazonas, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., et al., Defendants. Nos. 00-CV-06617, 00-CV-02881 (NGG)(VVP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 16, 2001.
- European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc., 355 F. 3d 123 - Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2004
355 F.3d 123 (2004) THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY, Acting on its own behalf and on behalf of the Member States it has power to represent, and the Kingdom of Belgium, Republic of Finland, French Republic, Hellenic Republic, Federal Republic of Germany, Italian Republic, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Portuguese Republic, and Kingdom of Spain, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RJR NABISCO, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco International, Inc., RJR Acquisition Corp., f/k/a Nabisco Group Holdings Corp. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc., Philip Morris International, Inc., Philip Morris Companies, Inc., Philip Morris Incorporated, d/b/a Philip Morris Products, Inc., and Philip Morris Duty Free, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Department of Amazonas, Department of Antioquia, Department of Atlantico, Department of Bolivar, Department of Caqueta, Department of Casanare, Department of Cesar, Department of Choco, Department of Cordoba, Department of Cundinamarca, Department of Huila, Department of La Guajira, Department of Magdalena, Department of Meta, Department of Narino, Department of Norte De Santander, Department of Putumayo, Department of Quindio, Department of Risaralda, Department of Santader, Department of Sucre, Department of Tolima, Department of Valle Del Cauca, Department of Vaupes and Santa Fe De Bogota, Capital District, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., Philip Morris Incorporated, d/b/a Philip Morris Products, Inc., Philip Morris Latin America Sales Corporation, Philip Morris Duty Free, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., B.A.T. Industries, P.L.C., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, USA; Batus Tobacco Services, Inc. and British American Tobacco (South America) Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. The European Community, Acting on its own behalf and on behalf of the Member States it has power to represent, and the Kingdom of Belgium, Republic of Finland, French Republic, Hellenic Republic, Federal Republic of Germany, Italian Republic, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Portuguese Republic, and Kingdom of Spain, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Japan Tobacco, Inc., JT International Manufacturing America, Inc., JTI Duty-Free USA, Inc., JT International S.A., Japan Tobacco International U.S.A., Inc. and Premier Brands, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-7325(L), 02-7330(CON), 02-7323. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: January 29, 2003. Decided: January 14, 2004.
- European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc., 424 F. 3d 175; 2005
424 F.3d 175 (2005) THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY, Acting on its own behalf and on behalf of the Member States it has power to represent, and the Kingdom of Belgium, Republic of Finland, French Republic, Hellenic Republic, Federal Republic of Germany, Italian Republic, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Portuguese Republic, and Kingdom of Spain, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RJR NABISCO, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco International, Inc., RJR Acquisition Corp., f/k/a Nabisco Group Holdings Corp. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Department of Amazonas, Department of Antioquia, Department of Atlantico, Department of Bolivar, Department of Caqueta, Department of Casanare, Department of Cesar, Department of Choco, Department of Cordoba, Department of Cundinamarca, Department of Huila, Department of La Guajira, Department of Magdalena, Department of Meta, Department of Narino, Department of Norte De Santander, Department of Putumayo, Department of Quindio, 176 *176 Department of Risaralda, Department of Santander, Department of Sucre, Department of Tolima, Department of Valle Del Cauca, Department of Vaupes and Santa Fe De Bogota, Capital District, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., Philip Morris Incorporated, d/b/a Philip Morris Products, Inc., Philip Morris Latin America Sales Corporation, Philip Morris Duty Free, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., B.A.T. Industries, P.L.C., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, USA, Batus Tobacco Services, Inc. and British American Tobacco (South America) Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. The European Community, Acting on its own behalf and on behalf of the Member States it has power to represent, and the Kingdom of Belgium, Republic of Finland, French Republic, Hellenic Republic, Federal Republic of Germany, Italian Republic, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Portuguese Republic, and Kingdom of Spain, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Japan Tobacco, Inc., JT International Manufacturing America, Inc., JTI Duty-Free USA, Inc., JT International S.A., Japan Tobacco International U.S.A., Inc. and Premier Brands, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 02-7325(L), 02-7330(CON), 02-7323. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: January 29, 2003. Decided: September 13, 2005.
- Supreme Court to review European suit against R.J. Reynolds
Supreme Court to review European suit against R.J. Reynolds Sam Hananel, Associated Press, October 1, 2015, San Francisco Chronicle